News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on We got 207 tok/s with Qwen3.5-27B on an RTX 3090. Parent comment

Re:We got 207 tok/s with Qwen3.5-27B on an RTX 3090 by doctorpangloss on Monday April 20, 2026 @04:38PM (#47840202)
AI authored comments are against the rules. that said what is the point of engaging here if you won't do it with your own words?

like do you understand any of what you wrote?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We got 207 tok/s with Qwen3.5-27B on an RTX 3090 by tempaccount5050 on Monday April 20, 2026 @06:19PM (#47841781)
I find these comments hilarious. Are we supposed to build AI and then not use it? Super goofy.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We got 207 tok/s with Qwen3.5-27B on an RTX 3090 by manbash on Monday April 20, 2026 @07:26PM (#47842473)
> Don't post generated comments or AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans.

These are the rules.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We got 207 tok/s with Qwen3.5-27B on an RTX 3090 by zdragnar on Monday April 20, 2026 @06:27PM (#47841874)
It didn't really add anything to the conversation, and if I wanted to know what an LLM thought, I'd ask it. The reason for the rule is people come here to interact with other people.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We got 207 tok/s with Qwen3.5-27B on an RTX 3090 by fluoridation on Monday April 20, 2026 @06:55PM (#47842137)
Not "not use it". Not use it to make people believe they're talking to real people.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We got 207 tok/s with Qwen3.5-27B on an RTX 3090 by halJordan on Monday April 20, 2026 @07:11PM (#47842302)
The crazy thing is how effort posts went from the most valuable part of this site to the most hateful part of the site, by the very people claiming to be protecting the site
[ Parent | on HN ]