News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The "Passive Income" trap ate a generation of entrepreneurs by sfRattan on Thursday April 16, 2026 @09:04PM (#47801442)
I generally agree, but that basically sounds like prudent investing for eventual retirement. Yes, tune the degree of aggression both in terms of work input and spending restraint, but the "work input" has to be high (and effective) for those few decades.

EDIT: I'm also kind of writing in the context of having your own little economic engine that you own and control, and can be continually running, rather than owning a tiny piece of the abstracted aggregation of an entire economy's engines. That said, dead-simple, low-fee, market-indexed funds are a generally good place to put the surplus fruits of your own little economic engine.

Re:The "Passive Income" trap ate a generation of entrepreneurs by margalabargala on Friday April 17, 2026 @11:02AM (#47806700)
The difference is, in retirement, you're maintaining an awareness of your own end of life and it's okay if your net worth goes down YoY as long as it doesn't do so too fast.

Not so if you're doing the same thing at 38.