News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs by kennywinker on Thursday April 16, 2026 @01:00AM (#47788815)
How difficult? Is running 1000 minis worth $1,000,000/month of effort? I feel like it is.
Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs by ffsm8 on Thursday April 16, 2026 @01:33AM (#47789020)
And at that scale (1k) it ain't even that hard, a single room could be enough to hazardly drop them on shelves with a big fan to draw out the heat
Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs by runako on Thursday April 16, 2026 @01:31AM (#47789005)
There are many people who do not have ready access to a million dollars to purchase said Mac minis, much less the operating capital to rack & operate them.

Very smart play to build a platform, get scale, and prove out the software. Then either add a small network fee (this could be on money movement on/off platform), add a higher tier of service for money, and/or just use the proof points to go get access to capital and become an operator in your own pool.

Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs by nxpnsv on Thursday April 16, 2026 @01:53AM (#47789167)
If those numbers are true, they could tart with one Mac and can double every few months. But, I guess there are also many people who do not have ready access to whatever a Mac mini costs either...
Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs by runako on Thursday April 16, 2026 @09:49AM (#47792923)
You can run the simulation out, but if the idea works, you can get to scaled revenue much faster than organic growth keeping 100% of the margin.

This is essentially the same reason even the best money managers take outside money to start, even if they eventually kick out the investors.