Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs
by gleenn on Thursday April 16, 2026 @12:58AM
(#47788806)
Power and racking are difficult and expensive?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs
by kennywinker on Thursday April 16, 2026 @01:00AM
(#47788815)
How difficult? Is running 1000 minis worth $1,000,000/month of effort? I feel like it is.
Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs
by ffsm8 on Thursday April 16, 2026 @01:33AM
(#47789020)
And at that scale (1k) it ain't even that hard, a single room could be enough to hazardly drop them on shelves with a big fan to draw out the heat
Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs
by runako on Thursday April 16, 2026 @01:31AM
(#47789005)
There are many people who do not have ready access to a million dollars to purchase said Mac minis, much less the operating capital to rack & operate them.
Very smart play to build a platform, get scale, and prove out the software. Then either add a small network fee (this could be on money movement on/off platform), add a higher tier of service for money, and/or just use the proof points to go get access to capital and become an operator in your own pool.
Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs
by nxpnsv on Thursday April 16, 2026 @01:53AM
(#47789167)
If those numbers are true, they could tart with one Mac and can double every few months. But, I guess there are also many people who do not have ready access to whatever a Mac mini costs either...
Re:Darkbloom – Private inference on idle Macs
by runako on Thursday April 16, 2026 @09:49AM
(#47792923)
You can run the simulation out, but if the idea works, you can get to scaled revenue much faster than organic growth keeping 100% of the margin.
This is essentially the same reason even the best money managers take outside money to start, even if they eventually kick out the investors.