Re:“Involuntary porn” site tests the boundaries of legal ext...
by tptacek on Tuesday November 13, 2012 @10:34AM
(#4778474)
No. In my case, I jumped to this conclusion after reading about this on Mark Randazza's and Ken White's respective blogs for more than a week. There are lots of details and bits of evidence that the Ars story has left out.
There's always a veil of uncertainty over these kinds of stories, but let's just say that in this case, the veil is especially thin.
Notice how we are all (me included) willing to jump to a conclusion knowing only what we read in an article.
As I like to say there is a reason trials take a long time. Details matter and we don't have all the details. That said it looks pretty clear cut to me based on the facts presented as well!