I'll reiterate what I said above: entertainment and software are not life's essentials. Nobody's going to be seriously harmed by being denied access to them.
Nobody's going to be seriously harmed by us pirating them, either.
On the other hand, I bet there have been some pretty serious repercussions due to the sweeping bans like in TFA.
The logic here is quite simple: if you don't have to pay, nobody else has to pay, either, because you're not special. If nobody pays, then people who make media and software won't get paid, and production will slow to a crawl. You'll have destroyed the very thing you seem to desire enough to steal.
How does this not make sense to you?
But nah, you're right. Nobody has to pay. Everybody should pirate.
Now, that's been true for decades, of course. So why hasn't the entire system fallen apart?
Believing oneself to be special and above the law such that one feels justified in trampling on others' rights is textbook arrogance.
To say nothing of what all that means when those laws are unjust and themselves serve to trample on individuals' rights.
Are you?
> To say nothing of what all that means when those laws are unjust and themselves serve to trample on individuals' rights.
What rights are you speaking of, exactly?
Laws change even in the same region, so it is also temporal.
And one can work to change the laws too.
But it does not make sense, you have your pre-defined opinion and you are sticking with it, and we do not buy your argument, so it's best we agree to disagree here.
You've started with a retort to a point that some who would never pay for some copyrighted work are not a loss to copyright owner if they illegally use their work.
You've since expanded to everyone and SW development, and want to extend it to people who are willing to pay for the value a particular work provides them.
So let's go back to the beginning: can you please quantify how big is a loss to the copyright owner if one watches a movie they would skip if the only option was to pay for it?