News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple's accidental moat: How the "AI Loser" may end up wi... by throw0101d on Monday April 13, 2026 @08:41AM (#47751142)
> The simple fact is that a 16 GB RAM stick costs much less than the development time to make the app run on less.

The costs are borne by different people: development by the company, RAM sticks by the customer.

A company is potentially (silently?) adding to the cost of the product/service that the customer has to bear by needed to have more RAM (or have the same amount, but can't do as much with it).

Re:Apple's accidental moat: How the "AI Loser" may end up wi... by stavros on Monday April 13, 2026 @08:45AM (#47751193)
Yep, and since companies care about TCO, they reward the software with the lower TCO, which happens to be the one that uses more RAM but is cheaper to produce.
Re:Apple's accidental moat: How the "AI Loser" may end up wi... by lucketone on Monday April 13, 2026 @11:53AM (#47753884)
Until RAM prices increases significantly.