We've raised $17M to build what comes after Git

Re:We've raised $17M to build what comes after Git by satvikpendem on Friday April 10, 2026 @03:03AM (#47714564)

Funny the replies you're getting here when already we see companies with engineers not having written a single line of code since late last year when models became good enough to go end to end.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We've raised $17M to build what comes after Git by sph on Friday April 10, 2026 @03:20AM (#47714712)

We see companies running web apps on top of Oracle or not using any version control at all, let alone agentic coding; it doesn't mean it's a good idea because someone is crazy enough to do it.

I thought the consensus what that vibe coding is a bad idea and you're supposed to review whatever is machine-generated, however "good enough" you believe it to be.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We've raised $17M to build what comes after Git by satvikpendem on Friday April 10, 2026 @03:35AM (#47714805)

Where did I say it was a good idea?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We've raised $17M to build what comes after Git by Dylan16807 on Friday April 10, 2026 @07:13AM (#47716341)

Okay, please explain why the replies are funny.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We've raised $17M to build what comes after Git by satvikpendem on Friday April 10, 2026 @10:16AM (#47718536)

Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog, you learn more but you kill it in the process.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We've raised $17M to build what comes after Git by Dylan16807 on Friday April 10, 2026 @03:29PM (#47722594)

It was a joke? It comes across like you pointing out someone missing evidence and being wrong. Obviously you used the word "funny" but that's not usually a word that goes in a joke.

Nevertheless the joke is already dead. There's no reason not to explain.

[ Parent | on HN ]