News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Explore union types in C# 15. Parent comment

Re:Explore union types in C# 15 by pjmlp on Thursday April 09, 2026 @03:52AM (#47700523)
In Rust's case, union types should only be used for FFI with a C ABI.

As for C, it is a sharp blade on its own.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Explore union types in C# 15 by tialaramex on Thursday April 09, 2026 @05:04AM (#47701038)
I do not agree. MaybeUninit<T> is without any doubt more valuable than the C FFI use

I can't even think of any prominent C FFI problems where I'd reach for the union's C representation. Too many languages can't handle that so it seems less useful at an FFI edge.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Explore union types in C# 15 by pjmlp on Thursday April 09, 2026 @08:00AM (#47702533)
OS APIs for one, at least there are some Win32 calls that take unions if I remember correctly.

One of the reasons .NET had Managed C++, replaced by C++/CLI (nowadays C++20 compliant, minus modules), is exactly that P/Invoke (and RCW/CCW) cannot represent everything.

Which they don't want to expose on .NET type system directly.

[ Parent | on HN ]