Re:I Won't Download Your App. The Web Version Is A-OK
by account42 on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @07:15AM
(#47688623)
C and C++ pointers aren't any harder than pointers in assembly, at least as far as novices complaining about pointers being hard are concerned.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I Won't Download Your App. The Web Version Is A-OK
by t-3 on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @10:20AM
(#47690623)
They are though! Indirection in assembly is just something like:
ldr dest, [src, offset]
It's straightforward and pretty hard to mess up, and easy to read to because the format is consistent.Whereas in C all the following are valid (and it becomes even more confusing with assignment in the declaration statement, tons of footguns and weird syntax):
int* a;
int *a;
int a[];
int a[5];
Assignment is weird too, especially because dereferencing and defining a pointer both use '*'. *a = c;
a[0] = c;
Then you have structs/unions and their members, and what if those are pointers? You get . and -> syntax. It's weird and complicated, much much more complicated than assembly. That's before you get to casting and types which make C much more complicated than assembly for doing low level stuff.