News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic. Parent comment

Re:OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic by Art9681 on Sunday April 05, 2026 @11:55PM (#47656812)
Aside from the fabricated drama and the trend chasing, OpenAI still has the best overall model and API service. Anthropic is really good, no doubt. But gpt-5.4 is a better model than even Opus, even if its a marginal advantage. I use both.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic by ramraj07 on Monday April 06, 2026 @12:10AM (#47656899)
The advantage is marginal and sporadic, and its slower. Why would I use it over anthropic?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic by bhadass on Monday April 06, 2026 @12:23AM (#47656968)
I dunno, my experience mirrors the parent posters: we use opus for all our coding, but gpt 5.4 for all of our enterprise agentic work via api (much bigger amount of tokens). it just seems to be more optimized for this.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic by senordevnyc on Monday April 06, 2026 @10:34AM (#47661469)
It’s much cheaper, for starters.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic by patcon on Monday April 06, 2026 @12:07AM (#47656886)
Do you feel the companies' positionings are only marginally different in the same way the product is only marginally different?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic by satvikpendem on Monday April 06, 2026 @02:18AM (#47657537)
These days, yes.
[ Parent | on HN ]