News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by bryne on Friday November 09, 2012 @02:55PM (#4764468)
Honestly, quite a few of these logos are objectively pretty bad. I don't get a very positive view of LoudNoises' business acumen after reading this article.
Re: by huhtenberg on Friday November 09, 2012 @02:55PM (#4764470)
Yet Another Random List of Logos. Please somebody flag this off the front page.
Re: by briancurtin on Friday November 09, 2012 @03:00PM (#4764489)
"I wanna open up with SEOmoz, because they are one of our favorite brands. Their logo doesn’t blow me away necessarily, but it is really great because their company is great."

The first of the 30 best web industry logos doesn't blow us away, but we'll include them because they're a great company. Flagged.

Re: by pgrieselhuber on Friday November 09, 2012 @03:02PM (#4764501)
Hey Brian, to us, actually Roger Mozbot is a much more attractive from a branding standpoint. We considered including him as well, looks like we should have. Thanks for the feedback.
Re: by mnicole on Friday November 09, 2012 @03:10PM (#4764530)
Quality hilarity aside, how hard is it to email a marketing team and ask for a version that isn't fuzzy? I'd be pretty bothered if I worked at one of these companies and this is how I was represented.
Re: by pgrieselhuber on Friday November 09, 2012 @03:00PM (#4764492)
Bryne, perhaps you're right. In hindsight perhaps we stretched our own standards to hit an arbitrary number. Point taken, we'll revise the post. Thanks for the feedback.