Show HN: Claude Code rewritten as a bash script

Re:Show HN: Claude Code rewritten as a bash script by Imustaskforhelp on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @07:32AM (#47599447)

I am now waiting for, Claude Code rewritten in assembly project :)

(Maybe it can be a good project for anyone who works low-level)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Claude Code rewritten as a bash script by rpst on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @08:59AM (#47600239)

we’re going to have a bunch of CC rewritten in <obscure language>

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Claude Code rewritten as a bash script by kridsdale1 on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @10:50AM (#47601729)

Waiting for Rust.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Claude Code rewritten as a bash script by Imustaskforhelp on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @10:52AM (#47601747)

Claw-code (reached 100k stars on github and I have made an article about them[0]) are currently re-writing claude-code in rust (they have already ported it to python)

Its worth following: https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code

[0]: my article: https://smileplease.mataroa.blog/blog/claw-code-reaches-100k...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Claude Code rewritten as a bash script by dghong on Friday April 03, 2026 @02:42AM (#47623870)

This is built by studying the leaked source. "Clean-room rewrite" doesn't mean much when you've read the original first — that's not clean-room, that's copying with extra steps. This is theft, plain and simple.

The stars on the original claw-code repo were earned through the leak, not the work. Riding that wave with another clone doesn't make it original engineering.

Also worth noting: this wasn't submitted as Show HN — it's being promoted through comment threads instead. Make of that what you will.

Real open-source respects both the letter and the spirit of IP law.

[ Parent | on HN ]