I don't think this is warranted given that the comment you're criticising is simply expressing an opinion explicitly solicited by the comment it's responding to.

> Sure. You could have. But you're not the one playing football in the Champions League.

The only reason people are using Claude Code is because it's the only way to use their (heavily subsidized) subscription plans. People who are okay with using and paying for their APIs often opt out for other, better, tools.

Also, analogies don't work. As we know for a fact that Claude Code is a bloated mess that these "champions league-level engineers" can't fix. They literally talk about it themselves: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47598488 (they had to bring in actual Champions League engineers from bun to fix some of their mess).

"Even I would have scored that goal" == "I would never ever have created a bloated mess like Anthropic"

You just repeat the same statement.

That bloated mess is what got them to the Champions League. They did what was necessary to get them here. And they succeeded so far.

But hey, according to some it can be replicated in 50k lines of wrapper code around a terminal command, so for Anthropic it's just one afternoon of vibe coding to get rid of this mess. So what's the problem? /s

> Even I would have scored that goal" == "I would never ever have created a bloated mess like Anthropic"

Since you keep putting words in my mouth that I never said, and keep being deliberately obtuse, this particular branch is over.

Go enjoy Win11 written by same level of champions or something.

Adieu.

Ah, Winning Eleven.

Not what you were referring to.

It’s more like “Player A is better than Player B” coming from a professional player in a smaller league who is certainly qualified to have that opinion.

Yes, exactly. I like this analogy. I am surprised the level of pearl clutching in these discussions on Hacker News. Everybody wants to be an attention sharecropper, lol.