News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by CWuestefeld on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @02:31PM (#47591535)
But sure everything would be better if any moron was allowed to decide how to keep their own kids safe.

Yes, I think that we'd all be better off if every person was allowed to have their own personal values, deciding what's more important to themSELVES, rather than piling on and trying to force every one into a one-size-fits-all solution.

For my part, I'd much rather have people wishing me "have a rich and fulfilling life" rather than "be timid and careful to maximize your time even if it's boring and unrewarding".

Sure, you can disagree with my priorities, but that's the whole point. We should each be able to have our own priorities.

Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by sfn42 on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @07:00PM (#47594614)
I don't think you should be allowed to recklessly endanger your children.

You can endanger yourself all you like, I couldn't care less but you don't get to endanger others even if you made them.

Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by kortilla on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @03:08AM (#47597809)
Do you think it’s okay for people to indoctrinate their own children with religion and other political views?

Far more harm comes from that than tail risk elimination mandating car seats between 8 and 12 years.

Would you be willing to make all new parents submit to frequent breathalyzers during pregnancy and after birth? Drinking is a massive factor in infant mortality at birth and SIDS.

Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by sfn42 on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @08:02AM (#47599689)
I don't see a reasonable way to avoid parents imposing their beliefs on their kids so this point you're trying to make is pretty weak man. You're comparing a problem with a very clear solution vs a problem with no clear solution. You wanna take the kids away from all religious people and all people with differing political views? Good luck with that.

Should all parents submit to frequent breathalyzers? Tell me, how many parents, as a fraction of all parents, drink irresponsibly to the point where it significantly endangers their children?

Now compare that number to the fraction of parents who drive their kids around in cars. I think if you rub your two brain cells really hard together you might realize how dumb you make yourself seem with this comment. You're grasping at straws comparing apples and oranges.

Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by kortilla on Saturday April 04, 2026 @02:15AM (#47636357)
>Tell me, how many parents, as a fraction of all parents, drink irresponsibly to the point where it significantly endangers their children?

More than the ones that get harmed between 8 and 12 in cars.

Your whole argument seems to be “it would be okay to take kids from their parents if the enforcement was easy”. It’s clear that you’re in the camp of sacrificing pretty much any liberty in the name of safety.

Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by sfn42 on Saturday April 04, 2026 @10:29PM (#47645607)
Holy crap lol, in what universe is that my argument? That was my response to your posed problem. You suggested that it was bad that parents indoctrinate their children - I didn't say we should take their children away I pointed out that taking their children away is the only way to stop them from indoctrinating them. I made it extremely clear that I did not consider this a viable option lol.

Holy crap man how braindead are you? I'm out of this conversation there's clearly no point talking to you. Wow.