News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by Havoc on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @07:55AM (#47586039)
Suicide ideation and someone willing to take massive risks for something awesome are very different things
Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by Waterluvian on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @09:22AM (#47586996)
I'm sure the other astronauts are really looking forward to fly with a person showing signs of tolerating massive risks.
Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by Havoc on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @09:26AM (#47587047)
Each and every one of them is fully aware that it’s a massive risk and has made their peace with that. You’re getting strapped to a giant rocket. It’s inherently dangerous
Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by spiralcoaster on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @12:00PM (#47589371)
Right, so let's add more risk by flying side by side with some nutjob with no regard for their own life. Sounds reasonable.
Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by Waterluvian on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @09:27AM (#47587061)
I don’t actually think astronauts take massive risks. They take massively well-understood and meticulously mitigated risks.

Maybe this is a perspective or semantics thing, but I think it’s distinct and important. They’re not Mavericks they’re Icemans.

Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by inetknght on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @09:58AM (#47587511)
> They take massively well-understood and meticulously mitigated risks.

Hopefully they're well-understood and meticulously mitigated risks. Because if they're not... well there's always modern day Boeing.

Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by hajile on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @08:00PM (#47595080)
Historically, around 60% of all astronauts were from the military which is a high-risk occupation.

In the 50s, there was something like a handful of test pilots dying every single month. A subset of the ones who survived became the first astronauts. My understanding is that there are still a significant number of astronauts who were test pilots first.

If you don't have massive risk tolerance, you don't sign up for a moon mission.

Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by randomNumber7 on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @12:40PM (#47590014)
> The trip is far more awesome than anything I have planned for the rest of my life.

If you would give your live for a single awsome trip (and you would still have multiple years to live), then you are likely suicidal.

Even if it is rational because your live sucks so hard, I would still have to classify you as suicidal.

Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by rhcom2 on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @02:06PM (#47591251)
Is jumping on a grenade to save another person suicidal? Or is it just a matter of you not agreeing with the rational?
Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by randomNumber7 on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @04:58PM (#47593384)
No. You save another person. An awsome trip isn't the same.
Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by rhcom2 on Wednesday April 01, 2026 @06:46PM (#47607499)
Of course it isn't the same, but it does show it is just a matter of you not agreeing with the rational
Re:Artemis II is not safe to fly by MoltenMan on Tuesday March 31, 2026 @12:52PM (#47590192)
...no? It's the same as when you say you'd 'die for somebody'. I don't want to die, but if I had to die to save my family I would. That's not being suicidal. Similarly, if space is important enough to you to take this risk (which realistically is a pretty low risk!) I wouldn't call that suicidal either. I take the risk of death driving in my car every day; that's the nature of life.