News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Judge blocks Pentagon effort to 'punish' Anthropic with supply chain risk label. Parent comment

Re:Judge blocks Pentagon effort to 'punish' Anthropic with s... by ImJamal on Friday March 27, 2026 @05:30PM (#47548528)
It is not even first past the post that is the problem. Even if you had some sort of ranked voting or parliamentary system you would still end up with the same problem. The person in charge gets changed too frequently to be able to have long term plans. 8 years is too short to execute a plan that will take 10 or 20 years.

I think this is why FDR was a successful president and was able to get so much done. He had 3 complete terms and a partial 4th term.

If you are going to have shorter terms you need to have your successor continue with your plans, but in a liberal democracy you don't know who is going to follow you. Even if your party wins, your successor might not continue with the plan.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Judge blocks Pentagon effort to 'punish' Anthropic with s... by jacker38 on Saturday March 28, 2026 @09:37PM (#47559703)
In preferential Systems you must chase the centre, in the USA it might be trains versus cars, in Australia because both sides are chasing the centre they will both agree on a train line it's just the specifics they will argue about which believe leads to better outcomes.

At least from my experience I would say change of government won't lead to cancellation of a project or reform just an expansion or contraction in scope.

You can't do something like implement a 1 child policy and stick to it for decades causing a demographic collapse because it wouldn't have broad appeal from the population.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Judge blocks Pentagon effort to 'punish' Anthropic with s... by ImJamal on Monday March 30, 2026 @09:20AM (#47573944)
Your last paragraph is my point. Some policies may be good, but not popular. (I'm not suggesting the one child policy is good). How would you be able to continue a policy like the one child policy in a democracy for decades? You wouldn't be able to. With China since their leaders are there longer and because the leaders have a more consistent world view they were able to continue with such a policy.
[ Parent | on HN ]