News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Iran-linked hackers claim breach of FBI director's person... by drnick1 on Friday March 27, 2026 @11:41AM (#47544134)
> Aren't these the same people who apparently used Signal with a journalist in the chat, and had military conversations in that very chat?

Signal is one of the most secure communication platforms out there, but it is obviously not immune to human error or social engineering.

Re:Iran-linked hackers claim breach of FBI director's person... by mikeyouse on Friday March 27, 2026 @12:10PM (#47544593)
Also wildly illegal to use to conduct government business, especially confidential government business. (and yes the messages were auto-deleting and largely lost before anyone chimes in with technically they could be archived!)
Re:Iran-linked hackers claim breach of FBI director's person... by nickburns on Friday March 27, 2026 @12:11PM (#47544620)
It was a custom (presumably DoD-approved) build. But the story gets much better than that:

https://youtu.be/KFYyfrTIPQY&t=724

Re:Iran-linked hackers claim breach of FBI director's person... by embedding-shape on Friday March 27, 2026 @12:08PM (#47544568)
Ok? Signal is not the topic of my comment really, nor has anyone claimed it's less secure than other chat apps.
Re:Iran-linked hackers claim breach of FBI director's person... by krisoft on Saturday March 28, 2026 @05:57AM (#47553143)
> Signal is one of the most secure communication platforms out there

That might be true amongst the communication platforms available for the average Joe. It is definietly not the most secure communication platform available for someone high ranking in the USA government.

> it is obviously not immune to human error or social engineering

Nothing is immune. But there are systems more and systems less prone to these issues.

Re:Iran-linked hackers claim breach of FBI director's person... by esseph on Saturday March 28, 2026 @01:43PM (#47556769)