Re:Marriage over, €100k down; AI users whose lives were wrec...
by snypher on Friday March 27, 2026 @02:26PM
(#47546431)
I believe that, much the same way as a fighter jet designed for the average pilot doesn't fit any of them, the 'average' of written text ends up reading like an LLM without being able to find a 100% matching sample.
Re:Marriage over, €100k down; AI users whose lives were wrec...
by xigoi on Friday March 27, 2026 @02:53PM
(#47546758)
I certainly used em dashes before 2022, and so did anyone who cares about proper typography.
Re:Marriage over, €100k down; AI users whose lives were wrec...
by lelanthran on Friday March 27, 2026 @04:50PM
(#47548077)
> I certainly used em dashes before 2022, and so did anyone who cares about proper typography.
Who said anything about em-dashes? There's an entire Wikipedia page documenting the tells, and only one of the 15 or so items is "extended usage of em-dashes".
It's not fluff, it's actual tells.
No nonsense, no BS, just tells.
The key insight is...
Re:Marriage over, €100k down; AI users whose lives were wrec...
by xigoi on Friday March 27, 2026 @04:53PM
(#47548125)
I have seen people accuse someone of using AI solely because the comment contained em dashes.
Re:Marriage over, €100k down; AI users whose lives were wrec...
by lelanthran on Friday March 27, 2026 @05:16PM
(#47548372)
> I have seen people accuse someone of using AI solely because the comment contained em dashes.
Yeah, but you haven't seen me do that :-)
(You also haven't seen anyone on HN recently (since this year) do that either).
Everyone keeps saying this, and I keep asking for a link to this type of writing that is dated pre-2022, and I keep getting nothing.
If it was that common, I'd have gotten at least a few examples by now.