Re:$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
by weird-eye-issue on Friday March 27, 2026 @06:48AM
(#47541081)
The person you were replying to was not talking about SF but you specifically called out SF so you were implying that
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
by stavros on Friday March 27, 2026 @06:51AM
(#47541099)
The thread started with "$200 is a lot for most of the world", the person I was replying to said "no it's not, now anyone can sell to billions of people", and I said "company success being concentrated in SF shows that that's not true".
I didn't say "only SF can afford $200/mo".
Re:$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
by weird-eye-issue on Friday March 27, 2026 @07:03AM
(#47541193)
"I guess all those people who live in not-SF just can't be bothered to succeed!"
Re:$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
by stavros on Friday March 27, 2026 @07:05AM
(#47541203)
I explained it in my previous comment, I'm not going to explain it more than that.
Re:$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
by weird-eye-issue on Friday March 27, 2026 @07:27AM
(#47541379)
Again, if you think that only successful companies are in SF you live in a bubble.
Re:$500 GPU outperforms Claude Sonnet on coding benchmarks
by walletdrainer on Saturday March 28, 2026 @08:22AM
(#47553919)
>company success being concentrated in SF shows that that's not true
You didn’t say that until now.
I think you’re wrong, SF being particularly good for big companies might indicate something if the conversation was about succeeding at a grand scale, not about being able to afford $200/mo