Re:Intel Announces Arc Pro B70 and Arc Pro B65 GPUs
by einr on Thursday March 26, 2026 @12:53PM
(#47532815)
It’s not the tooling for me, macOS is just bad as a server OS for many reasons. Weird collisions with desktop security features, aggressive power saving that you have to fight against, root not being allowed to do root stuff, no sane package management, no OOB management, ultra slow OS updates, and generally but most importantly: the UNIX underbelly of macOS has clearly not been a priority for a long time and is rotting with weird inconsistent and undocumented behaviour all over the place.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel Announces Arc Pro B70 and Arc Pro B65 GPUs
by wolfhumble on Thursday March 26, 2026 @02:18PM
(#47533890)
> Weird collisions with desktop security features
Linux is not immune to BIOS/UEFI firmware attacks either. Secure Boot, TPM, and LUKS can work well together, but you still depend on proprietary firmware that you do not fully control. LogoFAIL is a good example of that risk, especially in an evil maid scenario involving temporary physical access. I think Apple has tighter control over this layer.
Re:Intel Announces Arc Pro B70 and Arc Pro B65 GPUs
by functional_dev on Thursday March 26, 2026 @05:22PM
(#47535934)
Yeah... attacks like LogoFAIL hit during the DXE and BDS phases when the firmware is acting as its own 'mini OS' before the handoff
Easier to comprehend here - https://vectree.io/c/uefi-firmware-architecture-principles
Re:Intel Announces Arc Pro B70 and Arc Pro B65 GPUs
by MrDrMcCoy on Thursday March 26, 2026 @06:35PM
(#47536694)
You completely misunderstood the quoted remark you responded to. The desktop security features in MacOS that interfere with unblessed binaries and libraries loading is a huge pain in the ass, especially for headless server use.