Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by thin_carapace on Wednesday March 25, 2026 @06:57PM
(#47524402)
tobacco contains MAO inhibiting compounds, which potentiate nicotine and increase addiction potential. that doesnt mean nicotine on its own isnt insanely addictive, i have no idea what the guy youre responding to is talking about. however, MAOIs were withdrawn as antidepressants for a good reason - they have a terrible withdrawal all on their own.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by ien24sdq on Thursday March 26, 2026 @12:12PM
(#47532303)
Gwern has a pretty good post on it:
Intuitively, why would you chew nicontine gum to stop smoking if it was just as addictive as cigarettes?
Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by thin_carapace on Thursday March 26, 2026 @09:27PM
(#47538044)
this article isnt as relevant as when it was written. eg regarding price, cigarette taxation has skyrocketed in certain countries. furthermore, the depicted studies were performed prior to the proliferation of disposable vapes - i somehow doubt that the idea of infinite nicotine on tap was accounted for. as to your question, some individuals find cutting down to be easier than cold turkeying. personally i opt for the latter, although this strategy should not be universally applied (eg. alcohol withdrawal may induce seizures). at the end of the day i find smoking (not vaping or gum) to be a net neutral - controlled motivation, treatment of schizophrenia symptoms, and neuroprotectivity are balanced out by addiction potential, shortening of lifespan, and reduced red blood cell count.
Re:Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media...
by Ferret7446 on Thursday March 26, 2026 @10:00PM
(#47538290)
Presumably because you aren't turning your lungs into jerky. Sounds like a strict improvement to me