News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on InariWatch – Open-source AI monitoring that writes the fix while you sleep.

Re:InariWatch – Open-source AI monitoring that writes the fi... by mitul005 on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @11:04AM (#47503727)
Curious how it handles false positives though. Auto-generated fixes on a misdiagnosed alert sounds like a bad time. How much human review is expected in the loop before a fix gets applied?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:InariWatch – Open-source AI monitoring that writes the fi... by jesusbr on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @11:13AM (#47503882)
Good question — it won’t break prod on a bad diagnosis.

Worst case, you get a draft PR with a bad fix. It only auto-merges if it’s very safe.

There are 5 gates before auto-merge: CI must pass, ≥90% confidence, ≤50 lines changed, self-review ≥70/100, and agent trust level.

If any of those fail, it stays as a draft PR for human review.

Auto-merge is off by default and only unlocked over time as the agent proves itself.

We’d rather open 10 draft PRs than merge 1 bad fix.

False positives are real though — we’re working on improving that with a shared fix database over time.

[ Parent | on HN ]