News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LiteLLM Python package compromised by supply-chain attack by 1313ed01 on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @11:02AM (#47503679)
Sure, and that is basically what sane people do now, but that only works until something needs a security patch that was not provided for the old version, and changing one dependency is likely to cascade so now I am open to supply chain attacks in many dependencies again (even if briefly).

To really run code without trust would need something more like a microkernel that is the only thing in my system I have to trust, and everything running on top of that is forced to behave and isolated from everything else. Ideally a kernel so small and popular and rarely modified that it can be well tested and trusted.

Re:LiteLLM Python package compromised by supply-chain attack by dist-epoch on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @11:53AM (#47504538)
Virtual machines are that - tiny surfaces to access the host system (block disk device, ...). Which is why virtual machine escape vulnerabilities are quite rare.
Re:LiteLLM Python package compromised by supply-chain attack by bilbo0s on Tuesday March 24, 2026 @03:54PM (#47508153)
I feel like in some cases we should be using virtual machines. Especially in domains where risk is non-trivial.

How do you change developer and user habits though? It's not as easy as people think.