Re:Man pleads guilty to $8M AI-generated music scheme
by petesergeant on Saturday March 21, 2026 @05:21AM
(#47465449)
> Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice
It’s wire fraud
Re:Man pleads guilty to $8M AI-generated music scheme
by randyrand on Saturday March 21, 2026 @07:37AM
(#47466124)
Not it’s not. Creating fake accounts and instructing them to listen to music does not generate any money. The actual money generation, the actual fraud, was carried out on his behalf when the platform claimed the listens were real and charged the advertisers for it.
Under the letter of the law, this is just a TOS violation.
Re:Man pleads guilty to $8M AI-generated music scheme
by pocksuppet on Saturday March 21, 2026 @05:35AM
(#47465534)
What were the false or fradulent pretenses, representations, or promises?
Re:Man pleads guilty to $8M AI-generated music scheme
by barrkel on Saturday March 21, 2026 @05:50AM
(#47465624)
A false representation of user interest
Re:Man pleads guilty to $8M AI-generated music scheme
by pocksuppet on Sunday March 22, 2026 @05:15PM
(#47482235)
by accessing something on the internet with curl do I falsely represent using a browser?
Re:Man pleads guilty to $8M AI-generated music scheme
by potsandpans on Saturday March 21, 2026 @09:13PM
(#47473385)
Are you a lawyer?
All this guy did was break TOS, and find a broken business model. No fraud. Should have found a lawyer.