Re:Afroman found not liable in defamation case brought by Oh...
by wffurr on Thursday March 19, 2026 @01:24PM
(#47442798)
I don't think you understand what "de-escalation" is. It's not ignoring antisocial behavior or failing to confront people.
Re:Afroman found not liable in defamation case brought by Oh...
by aeternum on Thursday March 19, 2026 @04:12PM
(#47445220)
I'm not claiming that de-escalation implies ignoring antisocial behavior or failing to confront.
I'm claiming that some antisocial behavior is only triggered by some degree of escalation.
Re:Afroman found not liable in defamation case brought by Oh...
by bjoli on Friday March 20, 2026 @04:20AM
(#47451889)
I wonder what you base this on. What would statistics backing this up look like?
Re:Afroman found not liable in defamation case brought by Oh...
by aeternum on Friday March 20, 2026 @11:38AM
(#47456144)
It's a good question.
It would be violent crime trend correlation with de-escalation training. Or even with complaints of police aggression.
Even more useful would be to separate out assault + battery where the victim is random vs. non-random, IE domestic or gang.
The reality is there are aggressive people in society that have a tendency to escalate things. If police are trained to only de-escalate, it removes a powerful check on aggressive escalation.
The second order effect is an increase in events like people being pushed onto train tracks, glass bottles being thrown if you glance the wrong direction, etc.
I think optimally you have a police force that is trained in de-escalation but also escalates things slightly more than the average citizen and thereby provides a service to society as a buffer.