Re:Austin's Surge of New Housing Construction Drove Down Rents
by jjmarr on Thursday March 19, 2026 @02:24AM
(#47435649)
The regulation is single family zoning. Zoning makes it impossible to stack high rise apartment buildings in the areas that people want to live in.
Re:Austin's Surge of New Housing Construction Drove Down Rents
by bpt3 on Thursday March 19, 2026 @07:25AM
(#47437592)
People want to live in those areas because of the lower density. Remove that and they become much less desirable.
Re:Austin's Surge of New Housing Construction Drove Down Rents
by Sankozi on Thursday March 19, 2026 @03:20AM
(#47435969)
Of course demand is elastic.
Do you think, people will migrate to a city with an unaffordable housing (unaffordable for them)?
Unless you are living in North Korea, the competition is also there.
Re:Austin's Surge of New Housing Construction Drove Down Rents
by KellyCriterion on Thursday March 19, 2026 @06:52AM
(#47437341)
No, it is inelastic:
- inelastic means the demand is more or less independet of the price; you can't "just stop renting & living" if prices are going up, your options to bypass are highly limited -> therefore its called >inelastic<
Re:Austin's Surge of New Housing Construction Drove Down Rents
by Sankozi on Thursday March 19, 2026 @07:56AM
(#47437837)
You can "just stop renting" and move somewhere else.
Housing demand is less elastic than, let's say, potato demand, but it's not "absolutely inelastic" as you have said.
Re:Austin's Surge of New Housing Construction Drove Down Rents
by AlexandrB on Thursday March 19, 2026 @08:20AM
(#47438100)
Good transit and road infrastructure also both make demand more elastic because the choice of where you can live without changing jobs expands.
Re:Austin's Surge of New Housing Construction Drove Down Rents
by KellyCriterion on Thursday March 19, 2026 @11:00AM
(#47440646)
In MBA101-bobos world this is true in theroy, in practice its not. (let me guess: You do not have children, yet, right?)
Thats always the biggest difference:
In theory, there is no difference between practive and theory - but in practice, there is ;-)
In reality, those ideas do not apply to the housing market, esp. as there is no real competition; and because the demand is absolutely inelastic (if we are already applying in MBA-wording universe)
Also, that this is true you can see if you compare to housing markets which "are more free than the Australian"