News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A sufficiently detailed spec is code. Parent comment

Re:A sufficiently detailed spec is code by ex-aws-dude on Thursday March 19, 2026 @01:24AM (#47435290)
It will either be true or not be true

That is the great insight I can offer

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A sufficiently detailed spec is code by layer8 on Thursday March 19, 2026 @03:25AM (#47436001)
Wait, people still believe in the law of excluded middle?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A sufficiently detailed spec is code by ozozozd on Thursday March 19, 2026 @02:13AM (#47435576)
It is indeed of type boolean.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A sufficiently detailed spec is code by adi_kurian on Thursday March 19, 2026 @11:42AM (#47441338)
Mostly, I wrote "this won't age well", then appended the circular comment as I didn't want to sound like an arsehole.

Looks like I would have been better off!

[ Parent | on HN ]