Re:Show HN: LucidShark - Quality pipeline for AI coding agents
by PM_ME_YOUR_CAT on Wednesday March 18, 2026 @07:57AM
(#47424577)
I built LucidShark after getting burned too many times by AI-generated code that looked fine locally but failed CI with security issues or broken dependencies.
The frustrating part: the feedback loop is terrible. You write code with Claude Code or Cursor, commit, push, wait for CI to run... and only then find out you have a hardcoded secret or a vulnerable package. By that point you've already context-switched.
LucidShark runs the same checks locally; linting, SAST, SCA, dependency scanning - before anything hits your pipeline. It's a pre-commit gate that speaks the same language as your CI, just faster and offline.
Happy to answer any questions about how it works or the design decisions behind keeping it fully local with no cloud dependency.
The frustrating part: the feedback loop is terrible. You write code with Claude Code or Cursor, commit, push, wait for CI to run... and only then find out you have a hardcoded secret or a vulnerable package. By that point you've already context-switched.
LucidShark runs the same checks locally; linting, SAST, SCA, dependency scanning - before anything hits your pipeline. It's a pre-commit gate that speaks the same language as your CI, just faster and offline.
Happy to answer any questions about how it works or the design decisions behind keeping it fully local with no cloud dependency.