News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Six ingenious ways how Canon DSLRs used to illuminate the... by jagged-chisel on Monday March 16, 2026 @06:49AM (#47397340)
The comment reads like an LLM summary. And we don’t typically get an OP summary on a new post. Just post it and let people read it.
Re:Six ingenious ways how Canon DSLRs used to illuminate the... by xnorswap on Monday March 16, 2026 @07:11AM (#47397500)
HN appears to encourage it, because it shows a text box which becomes a top level comment when you submit, although it isn't obvious that will happen.
Re:Six ingenious ways how Canon DSLRs used to illuminate the... by Sharlin on Monday March 16, 2026 @07:25AM (#47397596)
Huh, that definitely explains it. I wonder how many people know that. In that case it's particularly unfortunate to downvote the OP simply for filling a field in the submission form! Sigh… I guess it's another case of LLMs having made the world a little worse for everybody.
Re:Six ingenious ways how Canon DSLRs used to illuminate the... by jagged-chisel on Monday March 16, 2026 @07:32AM (#47397650)
I don’t think it’s because the comment was submitted. I think it’s because it reads like LLM output.

Personally, I’ve only ever provided a summary if I felt the headline wasn’t clear enough.

Re:Six ingenious ways how Canon DSLRs used to illuminate the... by Sharlin on Monday March 16, 2026 @08:36AM (#47398132)
Yeah, but before LLMs we didn't have "reads like LLM output" as a downvote reason. In 2022 nobody would've had qualms with the phrasing of the comment.
Re:Six ingenious ways how Canon DSLRs used to illuminate the... by stavros on Monday March 16, 2026 @02:45PM (#47403041)
That box doesn't become a comment, does it? It goes into the description that shows under the link.