News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ageless Linux. We are legally required to ask how old you... by fc417fc802 on Sunday March 15, 2026 @07:17AM (#47386295)
But it is an argument against age restrictions since you could just as easily pass a law that instead required schools to enable various filters. You could even require mainstream devices from major manufacturers to support certain filtering standards. And you could require websites to send self categorization headers.

There is no valid argument for why ID checks are necessary if the goal is simply to get filtering implemented in places such as schools.

If instead the goal is to entirely prohibit all children from using social networks regardless of parental consent then it makes sense. It also makes sense if the goal is actually to violate privacy or something similarly sinister.

Re:Ageless Linux. We are legally required to ask how old you... by throwaway27448 on Sunday March 15, 2026 @12:58PM (#47389268)
I don't really give a damn about the freedom to say stuff on the internet, so you're trying to convince the wrong person.
Re:Ageless Linux. We are legally required to ask how old you... by fc417fc802 on Sunday March 15, 2026 @03:42PM (#47391104)
That's unfortunate, but what I said had nothing to do with that. I merely refuted the basis of your prior objection.
Re:Ageless Linux. We are legally required to ask how old you... by coldtea on Monday March 16, 2026 @03:03AM (#47395886)
You just want censorship and state control. So perhaps you have the wrong ideas. Your "solutions" are worse than the problems.