Re:SBCL: A Sanely-Bootstrappable Common Lisp (2008) [pdf]
by sl_convertible on Friday March 13, 2026 @04:31PM
(#47369459)
But there's a value in having a defined, stable language definition. Being able to rely on the basic language not changing is a feature, not a bug. Though it does mean you have to sometimes search for a good lib if you don't have a feature built into the language.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SBCL: A Sanely-Bootstrappable Common Lisp (2008) [pdf]
by tmtvl on Friday March 13, 2026 @10:00PM
(#47372538)
Did you respond to the wrong comment?
My comment said nothing about language permanence, though I would say that some measure of evolution can sometimes be for the better. I doubt many people would prefer programming in Java 1.4 over Java 21.