Re:SBCL: A Sanely-Bootstrappable Common Lisp (2008) [pdf]
by sl_convertible on Friday March 13, 2026 @04:31PM
(#47369459)
But there's a value in having a defined, stable language definition. Being able to rely on the basic language not changing is a feature, not a bug. Though it does mean you have to sometimes search for a good lib if you don't have a feature built into the language.
Re:SBCL: A Sanely-Bootstrappable Common Lisp (2008) [pdf]
by tmtvl on Friday March 13, 2026 @10:00PM
(#47372538)
Did you respond to the wrong comment?
My comment said nothing about language permanence, though I would say that some measure of evolution can sometimes be for the better. I doubt many people would prefer programming in Java 1.4 over Java 21.
In fact, I'd say CL is too minimalist, hence CLDR (a bit like SRFIs) and various libraries which form a sort of unofficial extended core (Alexandria, Bordeaux threads, CL-PPCRE,...)