That judge will be overruled just like all the other state level actions. Federal Law regulates this activity: CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said "see you in court" in a February 17, 2026, statement, vowing to defend federal authority over prediction markets against state-level, anti-gambling, cease-and-desist actions. The move defends platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, asserting the CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction, with Selig filing an amicus brief.

That can change at the federal level too. It's very associated with gambling addiction with a sizable portion of men under-50 having a problem in general.

It's derelict not try to addressing it, worse to protect the perpetrators. That's the Epstein class for ya

this is the key regulatory tension. CFTC says event contracts are derivatives, ohio says they're sports bets. the practical difference is huge — if they're derivatives, federal CFTC regulation preempts state gambling laws and kalshi has one nationwide market. if they're sports bets, every state can regulate or ban separately. given how aggressively states protect their sports betting revenue (and the lobbying from draftkings/fanduel), the state-by-state path would be a nightmare for kalshi