Re:Two Years of Emacs Solo: 35 Modules, Zero External Packag...
by NetMageSCW on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @10:52AM
(#47324082)
An editor environment based on Smalltalk would be very interesting.
Re:Two Years of Emacs Solo: 35 Modules, Zero External Packag...
by klibertp on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @04:48PM
(#47328614)
See GToolkit[1] - Lepiter is a bit like that. It's too notebook-y for my taste, but it lets you write and format text and embed any widget. It also uses a native GUI and is not a repackaged browser.
Re:Two Years of Emacs Solo: 35 Modules, Zero External Packag...
by jdougan on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @11:11PM
(#47331356)
Did they do anything to fix the OpenSmalltalk VM lamentable keyboard input?
Re:Two Years of Emacs Solo: 35 Modules, Zero External Packag...
by antiframe on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @10:29PM
(#47331173)
> But that's not what distinguishes Emacs, it's famously very mediocre at it.
I disagree. Every time I use another editor I lament missing features when it comes to editing text. Like most editors (vim excluded) have pretty lackluster undo, transpose, case altering, and text reflowing commands.
purely for text editing? No. But that's not what distinguishes Emacs, it's famously very mediocre at it. The point of Emacs is to be a fully transparent, inspectable, dynamic and changeable environment. In spirit similar to Smalltalk systems like Pharo. And for that a Lisp is not the only choice but a very good one.
There's very few languages and environments that facilitate jumping into any place, making a change, compiling or evaluating a block of code or treating it as data and continuing seamlessly.