News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by nextaccountic on Sunday March 08, 2026 @02:31PM (#47299728)
> We know this is only 200,000 neurons. Dogs have 500 million. Humans have billions. But where is the line for sentience, awareness? Have we defined it?

If this concern is genuine, I think the first step is to embrace veganism. Because while we don't know the exact offset, it's pretty obvious a dog or a pig reaches it

> What are the plans to scale up?

I don't know, slavery on an unimaginable scale? That's where AI is heading too, by the way. Sooner, rather than later, those two things will be one and the same.

Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by kpil on Sunday March 08, 2026 @03:48PM (#47300587)
I think "MMAcevedo" basically nails it: https://qntm.org/mmacevedo
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by gattr on Sunday March 08, 2026 @04:20PM (#47300995)
I don't think it's a best example. MMAcevedo is about running a real human mind on a different substrate (for science, for labor, or to torture it for fun a million times, I guess, by a bored teenager who got the image from torrents).

Scaling up these neuron cultures is rather something like "head cheese" from Greg Egan's "Rifters" novels (artificial "brains" trained to do network filtering, anti-malware combat etc.).

Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by Tzt on Sunday March 08, 2026 @04:27PM (#47301056)
>Greg Egan's "Rifters"

By Peter Watts actually.

Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by gattr on Sunday March 08, 2026 @04:41PM (#47301203)
Yes, sorry! I like them both a lot.
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by kpil on Monday March 09, 2026 @06:00PM (#47316205)
Will put it in my list :-)
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by bspammer on Monday March 09, 2026 @05:01AM (#47306476)
I had a genuine feeling of dread reading that, wow.
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by kpil on Monday March 09, 2026 @06:04PM (#47316257)
It takes some of the fun out of imagining eternal digital life, doesn't it :-)
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by fgfarben on Sunday March 08, 2026 @11:19PM (#47304518)
> the first step is to embrace veganism

The past 4 billion years of life for prey animals has been "get born, eat, get eaten by a predator." They have never experienced any other environment. Why do we owe them a different one?

Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by giladvdn on Monday March 09, 2026 @04:43AM (#47306325)
For me the issue isn't with the killing/eating of animals. Rather, it's how they are treated during their lifetime by the meat industry - which is essentially optimizing for the minimum conditions that can still provide meat that can be sold legally. I'm not a vegan by the way, but I can appreciate the moral case vegans make.
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by lachs2k on Monday March 09, 2026 @06:12AM (#47307032)
For the same reason that we now consider murder, assault and other actions that harm people morally wrong. These have also been a part of life ever since humans or other hominids roamed the earth, we just determined that they are morally wrong later on.
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by fgfarben on Monday March 09, 2026 @04:29PM (#47315024)
Oh? Are you going to do a citizen's arrest on a wolf for traumatically murdering a deer, thereby violating its right to avoid cruel and unusual punishment?
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by lachs2k on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @04:04AM (#47320302)
A wolf has no moral agency and therefore can't be held accountable for its actions. It makes no sense to compare them to humans.
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by nextaccountic on Wednesday March 11, 2026 @01:08AM (#47331919)
Why should wolves be bound to human rules? These rules were generally agreed upon by human societies, and it's the social contract that gives them legitimacy (and not some universal rule that extends even to wolves).

On the contrary, not only wolves can't be found guilty of murder, they aren't required to pay taxes too.

Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by nextaccountic on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @11:19PM (#47331399)
I don't know about your country, but in my country whenever there is a power outage there's news where some 10000 or 80000 chickens died because of the power outage

https://www.facebook.com/nhnoticiasmanoelribas/posts/queda-d... 5 days ago, 20k chickens dead in just twenty minutes without power

But power outages don't cause chicken death, at least not directly. The most immediate cause of death is dehydration. And it happens because chickens are kept in an environment so confined, so absurdly cramped, that without giant fans blowing 24/7 they overheat, dehydrate, and very quickly die. (in some cases, the beaks are clamped, too, so they don't peck each other to death)

That's what it takes to have cheap chicken and cheap eggs. That's what happens when we are so detached from animal food production that it becomes a commodity. It doesn't matter how much the animal suffer, as long as the consumer can ignore it safely when they eat. And the reason this can happen is that animal well being isn't worth much

Btw this environment doesn't look a lot like the natural environments the chickens and other dinosaurs evolved in

Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by bondarchuk on Monday March 09, 2026 @12:30PM (#47311282)
Surely you can imagine that there are people who draw their ethical line for permissible suffering with animal farming on the "permissible" side and "slavery on an unimaginable scale" on the "not permissible" side? Imagine you or someone you love duplicated 5 million times and living through 1000 subjective years of pure existential horror (while doing menial industrial cognitive tasks). Some would say this is worse than eating meat.
Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by nextaccountic on Wednesday March 11, 2026 @01:05AM (#47331908)
The duplicated people is imaginary and hypothetical, happening (or not) in an unspecified time in future; the suffering in animal farming is real and happens today.

Somehow many people are ready to ascribe personhood and have ethical considerations towards computer programs and other digital entities, while not being much concerned about the suffering of animals that actually exist today in the physical world

Re:Living Human Brain Cells Play Doom on a CL1 by bondarchuk on Wednesday March 11, 2026 @05:24AM (#47333402)
Yes, there's a difference between suffering that happens now, and potential suffering that happens in the future, caused by research being done now. I see many in this discussion (me included) have not made this distinction explicit in all their comments but I also think it should so be obvious that any counter-comment which appears to not understand that this distinction is being made implicitly is best explained as missing the point deliberately.

Anyway to reiterate my point upthread, there could be people who think a chicken-level entity suffering is permissible, and a human-level entity suffering is not, and it is a perfectly consistent moral position for them to say we should not do research into creating new kinds of human-level entities with the potential for suffering. The permissible suffering being in the present and the impermissible suffering being in the future does not really change that.

PS in this thread we were not only talking about computer programs, but artificial brains made from biological human neurons too.