It knows what it is, it's a very well known symbol. But translating that knowledge to code is something else.

Interesting shortcoming, really shows how weak the reasoning is.

Try writing code from description without looking at the picture or generated graphics. Visual LLM with a suggestion to find coordinates of different features and use lines/curves to match them might do better.

Most people just forget to tell it "make it quick" and "make no mistake"

I’m unable to determine if you’re missing /s or not.

That's kind of foolish IMO. How can an open ended generic and terse request satisfy something users have in mind?

agreed with part that at some point it's better to just do it yourself but for sure they will get better and better