News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dario Amodei calls OpenAI’s messaging around military dea... by vhiremath4 on Thursday March 05, 2026 @01:58AM (#47258439)
This is an interesting perspective. What happens if there is a large global war? Do researchers who were previously against working with the DoD end up flipping out of duty? Does the war budget go up? Does the DoD decide to lift any ban on Anthropic for the sake of getting the best model and does Anthropic warm its stance on not working with autonomous weapons systems?

I don’t know the answers to these questions, but if the answer is “yes” to at least 1 or 2, then I think the equation flips quite a bit. This is what I’m seeing in the world right now, and it’s disconcerting:

1. Ukraine and Russia have been in a skirmish that has been drawn out much longer than I would guess most people would have guessed. This has created a divide in political allegiance within the United States and Europe.

2. We captured the leader of Venezuela. Cuba is now scared they are next.

3. We just bombed Iran and killed their supreme leader.

4. China and the US are, of course, in a massive economic race for world power supremacy. The tensions have been steadily rising, and they are now feeling the pressure of oil exports from Iran grinding to a halt.

5. The past couple days Macron has been trying to quell tension between Israel and Lebanon.

I really do not hope we are not headed into war. I hope the fact that we all have nukes and rely on each others’ supply chains deters one. But man does it feel like the odds are increasing in favor of one, and man does that seem to throw a wrench in this whole thing with Anthropic vs. OpenAI.

Re:Dario Amodei calls OpenAI’s messaging around military dea... by ethbr1 on Thursday March 05, 2026 @08:08AM (#47261173)
> 3. We just bombed Iran and killed their supreme leader.

Being accurate, by all reporting Israel killed Iran's leadership.

Yes, likely enabled by US intelligence, but the one who pulls the trigger does matter.

Re:Dario Amodei calls OpenAI’s messaging around military dea... by ImPostingOnHN on Thursday March 05, 2026 @09:53AM (#47262211)
"We" here clearly means USA+israel. There isn't a distinction between the two when they're working towards the same goals, bombing everything in sight, together.

The one who pulled the trigger is irrelevant here, because both have pulled the trigger hundreds or thousands of times in the past few days, dividing up targets between them for the joint operation.

Re:Dario Amodei calls OpenAI’s messaging around military dea... by ethbr1 on Thursday March 05, 2026 @02:22PM (#47266051)
Given that direct assassination is still prohibited by EO 11905 / 12036 / 12333, it's a major issue if the US president ordered the strike or not.

I'm aware that internet forums like to play fast and loose with insinuations, but facts are facts.

Re:Dario Amodei calls OpenAI’s messaging around military dea... by ImPostingOnHN on Thursday March 05, 2026 @02:58PM (#47266495)
> Given that direct assassination is still prohibited by EO 11905 / 12036 / 12333

It sounds like you think this means something?

Obviously it doesn't when we're talking about an administration that openly breaks laws, much less EOs, and issues whatever EOs they want saying whatever they want, even in violation of previous EOs. There aren't even any repercussions to the president "violating an EO".

So, the pedantry here is irrelevant. The two parties are on the same team, working towards the same goal, doing the same things, divvying up the list of targets to strike.

Re:Dario Amodei calls OpenAI’s messaging around military dea... by ethbr1 on Friday March 06, 2026 @08:11AM (#47274525)
> It sounds like you think this means something?

If you'd rather talk with yourself, I'll see myself out of this convo. No time for folks who would rather indulge in hyperbole than messy reality.

Re:Dario Amodei calls OpenAI’s messaging around military dea... by ImPostingOnHN on Friday March 06, 2026 @12:08PM (#47277824)
Given that you totally ignored the substance of my post, and instead focused on attacking me personally, it does seem like you're not interested in a discussion, and not a good fit for the HN culture and guidelines. So yeah, maybe it would be better if you left.

Anyways, happy friday! Feel free to come back if you're willing to share why you think the president not complying with a presidential executive order is significant here, rather than insignificant.