News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Agentic Engineering Patterns by paganel on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @05:37AM (#47245625)
But can you mentally "keep hold" (for lack of a better term) of those tasks that are getting executed in parallel? Honestly asking.

Because, after they're done/have finished executing, I guess you still have to "check" their output, integrate their results into the bigger project they're (supposedly) part of etc, and for me the context-switching required to do all that is mentally taxing. But maybe this only happens because my brain is not young enough, that's why I'm asking.

Re:Agentic Engineering Patterns by duskdozer on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @07:06AM (#47246317)
I think the difference is that you're applying a standard of correctness or personal understanding of the code you're pushing that is being relaxed in the "agentic workflows"
Re:Agentic Engineering Patterns by vidarh on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @06:11AM (#47245898)
I have the AI integrate their results themselves. That's if anything one of the things they do best. I also have them do reviews and test their own work first before I check it, and that usually makes the remaining verification fairly quick and painless.
Re:Agentic Engineering Patterns by rune-dev on Wednesday March 04, 2026 @08:38AM (#47247237)
The type of dev who is allowing AI to do all of their work does not care about the quality of said work.