News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple slips below $600 in first trading day after exec sh... by Tyrannosaurs on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @11:41AM (#4723344)
Apple's movement over the past three months has been an exaggerated version of the NASDAQ or the Dow, up a bit around September, down to it's levels of about three months ago.

In Apple's case that peak coincided with the my hyped iPhone 5 launch which might explain some of the exaggeration.

There are many many people who understand the market better than I do but to me at least this is a complete non-story.

Re:Apple slips below $600 in first trading day after exec sh... by robinjfisher on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @11:45AM (#4723367)
Agreed.

Over the last year, Apple's share price has swung widely from $363.32 to $705.07.

Surely a more accurate statement would be that the share price has increased dramatically. Swung widely implies ups and downs.

The current dip is similar to one seen in April and its share price is still markedly up YoY.

Re:Apple slips below $600 in first trading day after exec sh... by corin_ on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @12:39PM (#4723699)
Currently it's hovering around $600, this is $105.07 lower than the high and $236.68 higher than the low. Sure, "swung" may lack the implication that overall the price has been going up, so it's not the complete story, but I think it's fair to say there have been pretty wild ups and downs.
Re:Apple slips below $600 in first trading day after exec sh... by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @01:26PM (#4724025)
The S&P 500, at time of writing, is down 0.26%. AAPL has a coefficient of expected co-movement with the market (ß) of 1.22. Thus, the expected co-movement of AAPL to the market is -0.32%. AAPL is down 1.8%. The remainder would be attributable, given no more information, to non-systemic factors.

AAPL currently has an implied volatility of 28.93%. The odds, quick-and-dirty Gaussian [1], of today's return happening by chance is less than 1%.

>"Apple's movement over the past three months has been an exaggerated version of the NASDAQ or the Dow"

Over the past three months (60 trading days) the historic ß has been 1.26. This would make the systemic portion of today's return -0.33%. Curiously, the historic ß for the past year (250 trading days) has been 0.94.

[1] Using a non-Gaussian alpha-stable or asymmetric generalised hyperbolic distro still implies this being a significant event not attributable to market noise (though there is some shadiness happening in the markets today with system's coming online after a non-standard detachment, e.g. KNX declaring self-help)

Re:Apple slips below $600 in first trading day after exec sh... by pilsetnieks on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @11:56AM (#4723434)
What if it was NASDAQ or Dow that moved because of Apple?

(I suppose Apple is not yet that big but it could happen someday. Maybe a popular stock having much more trades than others could have such impact?)

Re:Apple slips below $600 in first trading day after exec sh... by radicaldreamer on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @12:12PM (#4723534)
The NASDAQ does move because of Apple, it's weighted as 19.8% of the index.
Re:Apple slips below $600 in first trading day after exec sh... by chollida1 on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @01:26PM (#4724024)
Re:Apple slips below $600 in first trading day after exec sh... by Tyrannosaurs on Thursday November 01, 2012 @05:33AM (#4726777)
Provided as a comparison point as to what the US markets are doing generally.