News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to talk to anyone – and why you should (The Guardian) by lovelearning on Sunday March 01, 2026 @09:13PM (#47213049)
I'm not an extrovert. Introversion itself was probably more of a euphemism that I used to rationalize something closer to social anxiety.

But I feel I'm better off now for doing what the article suggested, over the last 5-6 years. Doing so improved my knowledge, my empathy, grew my revenue, built larger professional networks, introduced me to hobby networks, and helped with better financial planning.

I even changed to the extent of actually looking forward to outreach activities that involve a lot of conversations. I find them very satisfying because they help me understand social realities and people better than social media and books and help me develop empathy.

I wouldn't say I'm now an extrovert. My personality still prefers a lot of alone time. There are times when I still don't feel like talking to anyone. But they're now for positive reasons like books to finish rather than negative reasons like social anxiety.

I now tend to see things like introversion and social anxiety as obstacles. One can rationalize them in many ways but they'll remain objective obstacles IMO.

Re:How to talk to anyone – and why you should (The Guardian) by tumdum_ on Monday March 02, 2026 @06:27AM (#47216583)
Thank you for proving my point - for some reason you felt you have to explain how introversion is an „objective obstacle”.
Re:How to talk to anyone – and why you should (The Guardian) by lovelearning on Tuesday March 03, 2026 @05:29AM (#47230546)
Welcome, but your point hasn't been proved at all actually. Your point was that this sort of stuff is imposed upon you by a "dictatorship of extroverts."

But I'm not an extrovert and not supportive of a dictatorship of extroverts. For example, I'm not a fan of imposed socializing of office coworkers outside the office in order to fit in.

Regarding "for some reason," it's quite obvious - you made a mistaken assumption and that's the only reason I came here to gave a counter example and a counter view to your wrong assumption. I wouldn't have written any of this as a top comment.