News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microgpt by tadfisher on Saturday February 28, 2026 @11:02PM (#47203571)
Maybe the article originally featured a 1000-line C implementation.
Re:Microgpt by nnoremap on Sunday March 01, 2026 @12:05AM (#47203912)
I was basing this more on the fact that you don't have to look at C code to understand that non cached transformer inference is going to be super slow.
Re:Microgpt by wasabi991011 on Saturday February 28, 2026 @11:10PM (#47203612)
I don't see how that would be possible given the contents of the article.
Re:Microgpt by anonym29 on Saturday February 28, 2026 @11:26PM (#47203704)
It's possible that the web server is serving multiple different versions of the article based on the client's user-agent. Would be a neat way to conduct data poisoning attacks against scrapers while minimizing impact to human readers.