Re:OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their...
by charcircuit on Saturday February 28, 2026 @04:07AM
(#47192606)
The president changed it back to its original name with an executive order. The administration did not just start spontaneously using it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their...
by PaulDavisThe1st on Saturday February 28, 2026 @10:38AM
(#47196572)
The president has no authority to do this. Federal departments and agencies are named by Congress, and even the Republicans in Congress have shown no interest in formalizing this.
Re:OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their...
by charcircuit on Saturday February 28, 2026 @08:08PM
(#47202494)
The president can't change the law itself, but he can change the name they use.
Re:OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their...
by PaulDavisThe1st on Saturday February 28, 2026 @10:58PM
(#47203548)
The law defines the name they should be using
Re:OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their...
by charcircuit on Sunday March 01, 2026 @12:33AM
(#47204016)
It's not like there is a law that says they have to use that name on their X account or what domain to use for their website or emails.
Re:OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their...
by PaulDavisThe1st on Monday March 02, 2026 @04:40PM
(#47224521)
Sure, no such law that I know of. But there's also no law that suggests that anybody else needs to refer to the Department of Defense using terms that the president and his minions just made up out of thin air. I'm also arguing that going along with them, by itself, is harmful to a democratic government.
Re:OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their...
by herewulf on Saturday February 28, 2026 @12:23PM
(#47197852)
No, the Department of War is the former name of the Department of the Army and nothing else. DoD is a new creation that includes the Army, historic Department of the Navy, and the other, post-WW2, new services.
"Changing it back" is completely ahistoric.