News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model. Parent comment

Re:Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model by akarii on Thursday February 26, 2026 @05:32PM (#47172964)
Digital Photography and digital painting. Both were considered deeply offensive to a lot of artists. I have witnessed both first hand and the criticisms were verbatim the same as AI.

They said you couldn't become a good photographer if you didn't learn it with the limitation of film that forced you to make each shot count. Photoshopping a picture made it "not a real photo" and was banned from online communities and irl events, drawing in photoshop was not considered art. I find it very ironic that digital artists are repeating the exact same argument as the one used against their art

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model by debugnik on Friday February 27, 2026 @01:45AM (#47177354)
Switching to digital didn't change their fundamental mechanics, that's why they're still called photography and painting.

But there's no such thing as AI photography, and it's debatable how much mixed AI tools like inpainting are actually like painting and not just like issuing corrections to a commissioned painter. Just generating images from prompts definitely isn't AI painting.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model by UpsideDownRide on Friday February 27, 2026 @09:29AM (#47180859)
Limiting the number of shots and putting thought into each one, composition, focus in detail, exposure and other technicalities is important for great photos. Similar to AI if the person using the tool is mindless about it the resukts will just be mid as well as little to no growth and learning will be achieved.
[ Parent | on HN ]