Re:The United States needs fewer bus stops
by hirsin on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @02:02PM
(#47156154)
Which of the cities used as examples in the articles are "sparse"? LA? Pittsburgh is one of the smaller ones listed and while the bus network there is very hub and spoke, it's also still semi usable.
But to call NYC, LA, Philly, Chicago, Minneapolis, Houston, etc sparse doesn't seem very accurate. Yes, LA is vast, but I wouldn't call it sparse.
Re:The United States needs fewer bus stops
by andy81 on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @02:26PM
(#47156514)
LA is sparse by European standards, or rural by Asian standards.
http://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf CTRL+F for "BUILT-UP URBAN AREAS BY URBAN POPULATION DENSITY: 2025"
America is the exception for population density in general.
Re:The United States needs fewer bus stops
by crottypeter on Thursday February 26, 2026 @10:29AM
(#47167389)
Single family homes are sparse.
Ground level (not multi-storey) car parks are sparse.
Re:The United States needs fewer bus stops
by fn-mote on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @01:54PM
(#47156028)
This argument doesn’t mesh with what I experience in my daily life.
Busses go places I care about: two blocks from my work, and to the airport.
My US city is dense. Not like Europe, but unless the argument is that major metropolitan areas in the US are not dense enough (LA?), I don’t buy it.
Bus transit has problems, but I don’t think it’s as simple as the parent is asserting.
Re:The United States needs fewer bus stops
by xxs on Thursday February 26, 2026 @04:34AM
(#47163879)
Virtually US cities are not dense compared to Europe. The large cities in Asia are on its own level, though. US is at the bottom when it comes to population density. For instance LA has half the density of Romania's capital Bucharest.
the top comment is right and this article is a good exmaple of what transit people do. they get so excited about transit and how awesome it is that they forget about some of the more fundamental issues.