News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open Letter to Google on Mandatory Developer Registration... by sheiyei on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @03:39PM (#47142654)
Protecting from scams isn't protection from the victim themselves. That should be obvious from the fact that very intelligent and technologically literate people too can fall for phishing attacks. Tell me for example, how many people in your life know how a bank would ACTUALLY contact you about a suspected hijacking and what the process should look like? And how about any of the dozens of other cover stories used? Not to mention the situations where the scammers can use literally the same method of first contact as the real thing (eg. spoofed). ...And the fact that for example email clients do their best to help them by obscuring the email address and only showing the display name, because that's obviously a good idea.
Re:Open Letter to Google on Mandatory Developer Registration... by jrm4 on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @04:08PM (#47143073)
None of these things requires "locking down phones." Every single thing you've mentioned can be done in a smarter way that doesn't involve "individuals aren't allowed to modify the devices they purchase."
Re:Open Letter to Google on Mandatory Developer Registration... by NewsaHackO on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @04:21PM (#47143241)
You can't make a statement like that and provide no examples. What are some of your ideas for doing that?
Re:Open Letter to Google on Mandatory Developer Registration... by sheiyei on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @03:42PM (#47157559)
I'm very against the changes Google are doing, but I'm also against the claim that "people who get scammed are stupid and deserve it".
Re:Open Letter to Google on Mandatory Developer Registration... by bigstrat2003 on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @03:46PM (#47142744)
> Protecting from scams isn't protection from the victim themselves.

That is where we differ. It is, ultimately, the victim of a scam who makes the choice of "yes, this person is trustworthy and I will do what they say". The only way to prevent that is to block the user from having the power to make that decision, which is to say protecting them from themselves.

Re:Open Letter to Google on Mandatory Developer Registration... by joshuamorton on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @05:17PM (#47144085)
But the proposal here, requiring developers to register their identities, doesn't actually impact consumers at all. They still have the ability to make the decision about whether or not to trust someone.
Re:Open Letter to Google on Mandatory Developer Registration... by kode-targz on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @02:46PM (#47156799)
Yes it does, especially when you remember the fact that developers are also consumers. But even if they (we) weren't, it would still impact consumers. I, android user who's completely ignorant when it comes to android development or even mobile in general, would be heavily impacted by this. My custom youtube clients would never be approved by google. My (free) apps for watching anime and reading manga would never get approved by Google. And something that's approved today could stop being approved tomorrow. it's up to Google / Microsoft / Apple to decide after all, they're the ones in control of our devices. If they stop liking my open-source ad-free minesweeper game, then I can't play it anymore. I'll have to download their bloated proprietary version with ads and a subscription to keep playing.
Re:Open Letter to Google on Mandatory Developer Registration... by joshuamorton on Thursday February 26, 2026 @05:22PM (#47172836)
> My custom youtube clients would never be approved by google. My (free) apps for watching anime and reading manga would never get approved by Google.

Google isn't approving apps though. A developer provides identity verification and a set of apps (apk names & keys) they are responsible for. There is no verification process or approval from google. The entire process as outlined in https://developer.android.com/developer-verification is that you prove you own signing keys for an apk name.