News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sub-$200 Lidar Could Reshuffle Auto Sensor Economics by c7b on Monday February 23, 2026 @02:43PM (#47127674)
My understanding is that there's more data processing required with cameras because you need to estimate distance from stereoscopic vision. And as it happens, the required chips for that have shot up in price because of the AI boom.

But I think costs were just part of the reason why Elon decided against Lidar. Apparently, they interfere with each other once the market saturates and you have many such cars on the same streets at the same time. Haven't heard yet how the Lidar proponents are planning to address that.

Re:Sub-$200 Lidar Could Reshuffle Auto Sensor Economics by jerlam on Monday February 23, 2026 @02:55PM (#47127842)
How does Waymo handle it now? There are many videos of Waymo depots with dozens of cars not running into each other.
Re:Sub-$200 Lidar Could Reshuffle Auto Sensor Economics by ggreer on Monday February 23, 2026 @05:58PM (#47130243)
Re:Sub-$200 Lidar Could Reshuffle Auto Sensor Economics by overfeed on Monday February 23, 2026 @03:19PM (#47128181)
Lidar critics like to pretend that anti-collision is not a well-studied branch of Computer Science and telecoms. Wifi, Ethernet and cellphones all work well simultaneously, despite participants all sharing the same physical medium.
Re:Sub-$200 Lidar Could Reshuffle Auto Sensor Economics by c7b on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @01:22PM (#47140622)
I'm not a Lidar critic. I'm really just curious how they're addressing it, or plan to.