News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust by jibal on Monday February 23, 2026 @02:30PM (#47127498)
Non sequitur. Again, no trust was involved, only verification through extreme testing.

Also, as others have pointed out, "someone with no experience" simply isn't true.

Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust by muyuu on Monday February 23, 2026 @03:28PM (#47128301)
the trust element to me is jumping into a port, not specific code although code you didn't write in a language you're not an expert with, will ALWAYS introduce an added risk of falling into pitfalls you can only avoid with experience, the more the merrier

you're banking in the LLMs quite strongly when you do that, which may just work but i would be very worried about myself if i were in his boots

Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust by jibal on Monday February 23, 2026 @04:46PM (#47129388)
> code you didn't write

He did write it.

> you're banking in the LLMs quite strongly when you do that, which may just work but i would be very worried about myself if i were in his boots

I too would worry if it were you doing it.

Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust by muyuu on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @08:02AM (#47136573)
> He did write it.

he did not, the LLM did it

> I too would worry if it were you doing it.

i would not worry about anything you do, because it's obvious you would never get to that point

Re:Ladybird Browser adopts Rust by jibal on Tuesday February 24, 2026 @02:28PM (#47141535)
"It" was the C++ code ... you don't even understand what you yourself wrote.

> i would not worry about anything you do, because it's obvious you would never get to that point

Childish whatabouting and projection. I will never respond to you again.