I should point out the relevance of my argument, is completely independent from the fact the reply to this questions of yours, is higher than zero.

So dont see this reply as a justification. Just as a note that you failed to do basic diligence on distortions that are well known. And as I said, that are not relevant to the analogy.

"When Wall Street Is Your Landlord" - https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/02/singl...

"In one Atlanta zip code, they bought almost 90 percent of the 7,500 homes sold between January 2011 and June 2012"

That article doesn't support your point. Only a small fraction of the homes in that area are actually owned by hedge funds. You should check the facts before commenting.

You misunderstood me for the second time...

Nope, I understood that your comment was both incorrect and irrelevant.

I understand you're being both rude and arrogant.