News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by 0xDEAFBEAD on Saturday February 21, 2026 @09:51AM (#47101366)
OK, so what criteria would you specify?

BTW, the original intent of the Electoral College in the United States was pretty similar to this. Electors were supposed to be independent actors exercising their independent judgement in selection of the president. It wasn't sustainable for long.

Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by bubblewand on Saturday February 21, 2026 @10:20AM (#47101597)
This understates the failure: it was about as close to “immediate” as it could be. The whole structure was pointless just about as soon as the new state began to operate.

The electoral college is basically an appendix, except it was never a useful organ. It malfunctioned completely, right out of the gate.

Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by 0xDEAFBEAD on Saturday February 21, 2026 @10:47AM (#47101839)
Sure, so that suggests that these so-called "independent nonpartisan panels" are likely to fail immediately as well. It illustrates the principle that good intentions are no match for incentives.
Re:Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court by rvba on Sunday February 22, 2026 @04:52PM (#47115121)
I actually agree with you that the independant commission can lead to partisanship with extra steps.

Possibility to beat this deadlock: one party picking few candidates from the commission and OTHER party (parties) accepting one of them. Still can lead to "choose the lowest evil" and I can imagine Repiblicans not accepting anyone of Democrata were ruling.